Who This Is For
People who want a private Human Design relationship reading grounded in conduct.
Clarify a relationship question read through Human Design type, authority, centers, and conditioning through David's private written method.
Working Distinctions
The private question
Human Design can explain friction, but it should not excuse poor behavior. The written format gives the question enough room to be handled without performance, interruption, or public explanation.
What I would look for
I would look for where conditioning, definition, and projection are driving the connection, then test that against timing, ordinary facts, and the decision that is actually in front of you.
How to ask it in writing
Send birth details for you, the other person if available, relationship status, and the live question. Keep the request plain. The work is cleaner when the facts are separated from fear, hope, and interpretation.
What I would not claim
The report will not use chart mechanics to override consent or ordinary respect. A useful report gives you a readable pattern and a next step, not a theatrical certainty claim.
Before You Send the Request
- Name the situation in one sentence.
- Send birth details for you, the other person if available, relationship status, and the live question.
- Say whether the decision is what pattern can be worked with and what boundary remains necessary.
- Separate facts from interpretation.
- Do not send private material that is not needed for the reading.
Better Questions
- What pattern is operating around a relationship question read through Human Design type, authority, centers, and conditioning?
- What decision is mine to make around what pattern can be worked with and what boundary remains necessary?
- What ordinary fact would change the reading of this situation?